|
Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Apple A9 |
|
Comparisons 17-02-2023 Full testing data of Qualcomm QCM2290 vs Apple A9, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Vellamo, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy QCM2290 or Apple A9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM2290 |
Apple A9 | Total score | 70836 | 168386 | CPU | 19837 | 47145 | GPU | 26918 | 63993 | MEM | 11330 | 26945 | UX | 12757 | 30308 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM2290 |
Apple A9 | Single-Core | 183 | 501 | Multi-Core | 825 | 1088 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM2290 |
Apple A9 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1850 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | 2400 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x1.85 GHz Twister | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 3 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM2290 is 7% better than Apple A9 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCM2290 has 2 more core than Apple A9. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | PowerVR GT7600 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 136 | # of Cores | | 6 | # of Shader Units | 768 | 148 | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 22.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.6 | 26.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 26.2 | 56.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 29.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.1 | 23.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.4 | 32.8 | Real Racing 3 | 32.6 | 99.4 | Sniper 3D | 57.1 | 73.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.8 | 79.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 29.2 | 73.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 36.3 | 79.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 LTE modem | Qualcomm MDM9635M | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 450 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS, Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS | Galileo, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM2290 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A9 is better: 31 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCM2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Apple A9 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic
| |
|