Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 vs Intel Atom Z3735F

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 vs Intel Atom Z3735F, speed testing of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and Adreno 302.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom Z3735F is quad-core (Bay Trail). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, Neocore, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Octane V2, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 or Atom Z3735F and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Atom Z3735F

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

22%

Atom Z3735F

36%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Atom Z3735F

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212	Atom Z3735F
Total score	14552	21810
CPU	4066	6097
GPU	5528	8285
MEM	2333	3484
UX	2628	3930

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212	Atom Z3735F
Single-Core	38	57
Multi-Core	177	266

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 200 MSM8212	Atom Z3735F
Frequency	1200 MHz	1330 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.33-1.83 GHz Bay Trail
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR 2	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	1 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	333	1333
Memory bandwidth	6	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3735F is 9% better than Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 302	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	19.2	42.8
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	24
Display	960 x 540 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.4	7.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.6	18.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	6.5	12.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	5.8	10.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	8.5	14.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	13.4	22.2
Real Racing 3	9.8	15.9
Sniper 3D	10.4	16.5
Need for Speed No Limits	9.1	17.8
Mortal Kombat X	9.4	14.6
CSR Racing 2	7.8	14

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	8 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Intel XMM 7160
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	72 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3735F is better: 30
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 and Atom Z3735F, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 specs and review.

Atom Z3735F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Atom Z3735F specs and review.