|
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Intel Atom Z3735F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, comparison of GPUs Adreno 305 and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail). This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z3735F is quad-core (Bay Trail) and Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, Octane V2, Quadrant, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Atom Z3735F or Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreAtom Z3735F | 1% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Atom Z3735F | 36% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | 27% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingAtom Z3735F | 1% |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z3735F |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | Total score | 21810 | 21723 | CPU | 6097 | 6078 | GPU | 8285 | 8251 | MEM | 3484 | 3472 | UX | 3930 | 3901 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z3735F |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | Single-Core | 57 | 57 | Multi-Core | 266 | 265 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z3735F |
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 | Frequency | 1330 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.33-1.83 GHz Bay Trail | 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2/3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1333 | 533 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is 16% better than Atom Z3735F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Adreno 305 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 450 MHz | GFloPS | 42.8 | 21.6 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 7.5 | 5.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.1 | 16.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.7 | 10.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 10.6 | 8.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 14.2 | 12.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 22.2 | 20.2 | Real Racing 3 | 15.9 | 19.1 | Sniper 3D | 16.5 | 14.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 17.8 | 19.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 14.6 | 17.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 14 | 14.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | Qualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3735F is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is better: 11 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z3735F SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
| |
|