|
Intel Atom Z3735F vs MediaTek MT6592 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735F vs MediaTek MT6592, speed testing of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and Mali-450 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z3735F is quad-core (Bay Trail) and MT6592 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, GFXBench, Quadrant, Octane V2, 3DMark, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Atom Z3735F or MT6592 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z3735F |
MT6592 | Total score | 21810 | 32014 | CPU | 6097 | 8963 | GPU | 8285 | 12162 | MEM | 3484 | 5124 | UX | 3930 | 5752 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z3735F |
MT6592 | Single-Core | 57 | 85 | Multi-Core | 266 | 391 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z3735F |
MT6592 | Frequency | 1330 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.33-1.83 GHz Bay Trail | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1333 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6592 is 33% better than Atom Z3735F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Atom Z3735F has 4 more core than MT6592. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Mali-450 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 42.8 | 41.73 | # of Cores | 4 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 7.5 | 10.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.1 | 26.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.7 | 17.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 10.6 | 16.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 14.2 | 21.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 22.2 | 33.8 | Real Racing 3 | 15.9 | 22.4 | Sniper 3D | 16.5 | 34 | Need for Speed No Limits | 17.8 | 28.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 14.6 | 23.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 14 | 23.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3735F is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6592 is better: 25 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom Z3735F SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
MT6592 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|