 |
MediaTek MT8167A vs Intel Atom Z3735F |
|
Comparisons 01-06-2021 Detailed testing data of MediaTek MT8167A vs Intel Atom Z3735F, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like 3DMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MediaTek MT8167A or Atom Z3735F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek MT8167A | 1% |
Atom Z3735F | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek MT8167A | 27% |
Atom Z3735F | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek MT8167A | 1% |
Atom Z3735F | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek MT8167A |
Atom Z3735F | Total score | 26931 | 21810 | CPU | 7533 | 6097 | GPU | 10242 | 8285 | MEM | 4312 | 3484 | UX | 4841 | 3930 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek MT8167A |
Atom Z3735F | Single-Core | 71 | 57 | Multi-Core | 328 | 266 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek MT8167A |
Atom Z3735F | Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1330 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A35 | 4x1.33-1.83 GHz Bay Trail | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | DDR3, LPDDR3, DDR4 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1333 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek MT8167A is 11% better than Atom Z3735F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 128.75 | 42.8 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 7.7 | 7.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 21.4 | 18.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.6 | 12.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 13.4 | 10.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 17.2 | 14.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.8 | 22.2 | Real Racing 3 | 22.9 | 15.9 | Sniper 3D | 28.2 | 16.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 20.2 | 17.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 16.7 | 14.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 15.1 | 14 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Intel XMM 7160 | Upload speed | | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8167A is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3735F is better: 11 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek MT8167A SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Atom Z3735F SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
| |
|