MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs HiSilicon Kirin 955

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs HiSilicon Kirin 955, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Mali-T880 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X25 (MT6797T) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 955 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Octane V2, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Helio X25 (MT6797T) or Kirin 955 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Kirin 955

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

41%

Kirin 955

49%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Kirin 955

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Kirin 955
Total score	93545	102680
CPU	26196	28750
GPU	35553	39011
MEM	14960	16436
UX	16833	18491

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Kirin 955
Single-Core	242	271
Multi-Core	1089	924

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Kirin 955
Frequency	2500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	10	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.55 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1600
Memory bandwidth	14	25.6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Helio X25 (MT6797T) has -2 more core than Kirin 955. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	115.51	122.31
# of Cores	4	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	19.8	23.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	34.9	39.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	21.1	26.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	16.4	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.3	25.8
Real Racing 3	61.1	69
Sniper 3D	66.3	51.2
Need for Speed No Limits	55.8	63
Mortal Kombat X	55.8	63
CSR Racing 2	41.9	47.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 955 is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio X25 (MT6797T) and Kirin 955, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X25 (MT6797T) specs and review.

Kirin 955 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 955 specs and review.