Comparisons 19-05-2022 Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 or Dimensity 1000L.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 98% |
Dimensity 1000L | 93% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 91% |
Dimensity 1000L | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 94% |
Dimensity 1000L | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
Dimensity 1000L | Total score | 1021474 | 522216 | CPU | 163368 | 169526 | GPU | 139627 | 145302 | MEM | 106600 | 110751 | UX | 93142 | 96565 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
Dimensity 1000L | Single-Core | 1168 | 1111 | Multi-Core | 4246 | 3446 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
Dimensity 1000L | Frequency | 3050 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 8400 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 29.87 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 1024 KB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 14% better than Dimensity 1000L in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 1648 | 504 | # of Cores | 10 | 9 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 25.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 54.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 51.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 52.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 42.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 67.9 | Real Racing 3 | | 102.6 | Sniper 3D | | 112.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 61.6 | Mortal Kombat X | | 66.7 | CSR Racing 2 | | 71.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 80 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000L is better: 15 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000L • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
|