Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons   08-06-2023
   Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Dimensity 9200 Plus or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 9200 Plus99% MediaTek Dimensity 900073%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 9200 Plus86% MediaTek Dimensity 900082%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 9200 Plus97% MediaTek Dimensity 900072%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 9200 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score13841981021474
CPU387571286017
GPU526003388151
MEM221468163439
UX249146183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 9200 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core15831168
Multi-Core57544246

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 9200 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency3350 MHz3050 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography4 nm5 nm
Transistors count9200 millions8400 millions
Core configuration1x3.35 GHz ARM Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)7 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR5xLPDDR5x
Max. Memory32 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency85537500
Memory bandwidth6452
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB1024 KB
L3 cache32 MB32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 Plus is 8% better than MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC16Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency750 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS32001648
# of Cores1610
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile52.639.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)164.9121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra98.672.1
Call of Duty: Mobile91.266.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)140.1103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition201.9149.2
Real Racing 3197.4145.8
Sniper 3D215.7159.2
Need for Speed No Limits137.7101.4
Mortal Kombat X142.3104.2
CSR Racing 2118.687.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution320 MP320 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240240
Video Encoding resolution8K, 4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed7500 MBit/s.7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed3100 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavICBeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 2
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands