MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons 20-05-2022

Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

57%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

78%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

54%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score	801200	1021474
CPU	224335	286017
GPU	304453	388151
MEM	128197	163439
UX	144219	183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core	1455	1168
Multi-Core	4766	4246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency	3000 MHz	3050 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5800 millions	8400 millions
Core configuration	2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	7500
Memory bandwidth	32	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	1024 KB
L3 cache	8 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 1% better than MediaTek Dimensity 1300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	504	1648
# of Cores	9	10
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	31.1	39.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	94.8	121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.6	72.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	52.2	66.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	81.5	103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	117.1	149.2
Real Racing 3	113.7	145.8
Sniper 3D	125.5	159.2
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	101.4
Mortal Kombat X	82.5	104.2
CSR Racing 2	68.6	87.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 32
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.