MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

47%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

84%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

44%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score	1024044	1021474
CPU	286722	286017
GPU	389132	388151
MEM	163842	163439
UX	184337	183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core	1253	1168
Multi-Core	4256	4246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency	3100 MHz	3050 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions	8400 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	7500
Memory bandwidth	51	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1024 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is 1% better than MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	912	1648
# of Cores	6	10
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	38.4	39.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.7	121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.2	72.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.7	66.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.9	103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.1	149.2
Real Racing 3	145.2	145.8
Sniper 3D	160.3	159.2
Need for Speed No Limits	100.3	101.4
Mortal Kombat X	104.7	104.2
CSR Racing 2	87.2	87.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 21
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 12
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.