Comparisons 22-05-2022
Detailed comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 or MediaTek Dimensity 1300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 89% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Total score | 1096026 | 801200 | | CPU | 268491 | 163368 | | GPU | 334895 | 139627 | | MEM | 153388 | 106600 | | UX | 139755 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Single-Core | 1528 | 1455 | | Multi-Core | 4819 | 4766 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 14000 millions | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 12 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 32 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 320 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is 6% better than MediaTek Dimensity 1300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 504 | | # of Cores | | 9 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, NavIC, GPS, Beidou, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
|
