 |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7373X |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7373X and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, 3DMark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Furmark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7373X or Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 52% |
EPYC 7373X | 62% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7373X is 16% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 54% |
EPYC 7373X | 64% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.0 | 113.2 | | Valorant | 109.1 | 128.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.1 | 72.0 | | Apex Legends | 102.6 | 120.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.8 | 96.4 | | Overwatch | 88.4 | 104.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.3 | 88.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.6 | 64.3 | | Warzone | 85.1 | 100.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.6 | 108.0 | | Valheim | 90.6 | 106.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 20% |
EPYC 7373X | 20% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7373X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 161 | 127 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 759 | 5200 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 237 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1693 | 11021 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 584 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4251 | 28657 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7373X | | Single-Core | 122 | 1311 | | Multi-Core | 8325 | 42034 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7373X | | Single-Core | 786 | 1476 | | Multi-Core | 7851 | 24660 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7373X | | Announcement date | March 23, 2023 | March 22, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.05 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 16 | | Threads | 8 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 240 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 768MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 40% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7373X has 8 more core than Xeon Bronze 3408U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 26
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U and AMD EPYC 7373X before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
