|
Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Celeron N5100 |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Celeron N5100 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, RealBench, WPrime, 3DMark, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Blender, PCMark 10, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5100 or Intel Core i5-2500K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-2500K | 51% |
Celeron N5100 | 50% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-2500K is 1% better than Celeron N5100. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-2500K | 51% |
Celeron N5100 | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.5 | 89.9 | Valorant | 103.9 | 102.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.2 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 97.7 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 84.2 | 82.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.7 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 51.1 | Warzone | 81.1 | 79.7 | Assassin's Creed | 87.3 | 85.8 | Valheim | 86.3 | 84.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-2500K | 35% |
Celeron N5100 | 338% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5100 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-2500K since it has less power consumption: 95W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Celeron N5100 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 94 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 461 | 248 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 262 | 202 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 894 | 603 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 697 | 437 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2450 | 1604 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Celeron N5100 | Single-Core | 1684 | 1316 | Multi-Core | 4077 | 3246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Celeron N5100 | Single-Core | 998 | 610 | Multi-Core | 3399 | 1869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Celeron N5100 | Announcement date | March 11, 2011 | January 11, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1338 | Core name | Sandy Bridge | Jasper Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 2 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 1.1 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 6 W | Memory type | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-2500K is 66% better than Celeron N5100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-2500K is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5100 is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-2500K and Intel Celeron N5100 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-2500K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
Intel Celeron N5100 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|