 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Intel Celeron N5100 |
|
Processor comparisons 28-02-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Intel Celeron N5100 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, VeraCrypt, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, RealBench, Blender, Furmark, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, AIDA64, PassMark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5100 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 850.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Snapdragon 850 | 51% |
Celeron N5100 | 50% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Snapdragon 850 is 1% better than Celeron N5100. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Snapdragon 850 | 51% |
Celeron N5100 | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.2 | 89.9 | | Valorant | 102.5 | 102.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 57.2 | | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 96.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.6 | | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 70.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 51.1 | | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 85.8 | | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Snapdragon 850 | 200% |
Celeron N5100 | 338% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5100 is more energy efficient than the Snapdragon 850 as it consumes less power: 8W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 84 | 94 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 209 | 248 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 170 | 202 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 350 | 603 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 485 | 437 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1347 | 1604 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Single-Core | 596 | 1316 | | Multi-Core | 3792 | 3246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Single-Core | 482 | 610 | | Multi-Core | 2115 | 1869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Celeron N5100 | | Announcement date | February 12, 2021 | January 11, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | Unk | FCBGA1338 | | Core name | Kryo 385 | Jasper Lake | | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 4 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 2800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | DDR4 LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 1MB | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 850 is 54% better than Celeron N5100 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 850 has 4 more core than Celeron N5100. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5100 is better: 11
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 and Intel Celeron N5100 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Celeron N5100 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs 3015e
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
|
|
|
