 |
Intel Core i9-13900H vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PCMark 10, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Furmark, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, Blender, RealBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 55% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900H is 6% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 96.3 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 109.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 61.3 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 102.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 82.1 | | Overwatch | 95.2 | 88.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 75.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 85.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 91.9 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 90.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 87% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900H is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 4800HS as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 197 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 1712 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 472 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 3847 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1235 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 10590 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 1545 | 2605 | | Multi-Core | 32177 | 18943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 1884 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 15080 | 8153 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | January 06, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP6 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Renoir | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 13 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000098
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 29% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900H has 6 more core than Ryzen 7 4800HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is better: 2
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900H and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
