 |
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-11850H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-11850H and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 7zip, MATLAB, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, RealBench, SuperPi, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, AIDA64, Prime95, WPrime, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11850H or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i7-11850H | 57% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900H is 3% better than Core i7-11850H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i7-11850H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 82.5 | | Overwatch | 95.2 | 89.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 75.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 85.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i7-11850H | 130% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-11850H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 313 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 2281 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 747 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 5178 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1749 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 17071 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 1545 | 4095 | | Multi-Core | 32177 | 23900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Single-Core | 1884 | 1563 | | Multi-Core | 15080 | 8575 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-11850H | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | March 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 40 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 39% better than Core i7-11850H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900H has 6 more core than Core i7-11850H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11850H is better: 7
All the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i7-11850H before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-11850H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
