 |
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-13700HX |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-13700HX and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 7zip, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, WPrime, Gears 5, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13700HX or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i7-13700HX | 61% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700HX is 3% better than Core i9-13900H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i7-13700HX | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 105.4 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 119.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 67.0 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 112.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 89.8 | | Overwatch | 95.2 | 97.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 82.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 59.9 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 93.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 100.6 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 99.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i7-13700HX | 140% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13700HX is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 55W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-13700HX | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 351 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 3488 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 572 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 7728 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1971 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 22196 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-13700HX | | Single-Core | 1545 | 1803 | | Multi-Core | 32177 | 37816 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-13700HX | | Single-Core | 1884 | 2313 | | Multi-Core | 15080 | 17022 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i7-13700HX | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | November 12, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 16 | | Threads | 20 | 24 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 55 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 36% better than Core i7-13700HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700HX has 2 more core than Core i9-13900H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700HX is better: 26
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i7-13700HX before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-13700HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13905H
|
|
|
