 |
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-11300H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-11300H and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Gears 5, 7zip, RealBench, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11300H or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i5-11300H | 53% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900H is 10% better than Core i5-11300H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i5-11300H | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 93.8 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 106.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 59.7 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 100.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 79.9 | | Overwatch | 95.2 | 86.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 73.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 53.3 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 83.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 89.5 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 88.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i5-11300H | 147% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11300H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 32W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 199 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 1406 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 691 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 2464 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1771 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 7798 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Single-Core | 1545 | 3649 | | Multi-Core | 32177 | 13096 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Single-Core | 1884 | 1419 | | Multi-Core | 15080 | 5677 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | BGA1526 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 4 | | Threads | 20 | 8 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 2 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 32 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 24% better than Core i5-11300H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900H has 10 more core than Core i5-11300H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11300H is better: 6
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i5-11300H before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-11300H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
|
|
|
