|
Intel Core i9-9900 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-9900 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, PassMark, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, AIDA64, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS or Intel Core i9-9900.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-9900 | 55% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 55% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-9900 | 55% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.1 | 96.3 | Valorant | 110.4 | 109.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.8 | 61.3 | Apex Legends | 103.7 | 102.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.8 | 82.1 | Overwatch | 89.4 | 88.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.1 | 75.5 | DOOM Eternal | 55.2 | 54.7 | Warzone | 86.1 | 85.4 | Assassin's Creed | 92.7 | 91.9 | Valheim | 91.6 | 90.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-9900 | 74% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 87% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 4800HS is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9900 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9900 |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 219 | 197 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1931 | 1712 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 518 | 472 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4346 | 3847 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1284 | 1235 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12205 | 10590 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9900 |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Single-Core | 2864 | 2605 | Multi-Core | 17110 | 18943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9900 |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Single-Core | 1454 | 1185 | Multi-Core | 8933 | 8153 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-9900 |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | January 06, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151-2 | FP6 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Renoir | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 9 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 4MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000098
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9900 is 6% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is better: 6 However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-9900 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-9900 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|