 |
Intel Core i5-1345U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-1345U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, RealBench, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, 7zip, 3DMark, Furmark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender, MATLAB, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS or Intel Core i5-1345U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1345U | 56% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1345U is 1% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1345U | 54% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.8 | 96.3 | | Valorant | 110.0 | 109.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.6 | 61.3 | | Apex Legends | 103.4 | 102.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.5 | 82.1 | | Overwatch | 89.1 | 88.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.9 | 75.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.0 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 85.8 | 85.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.4 | 91.9 | | Valheim | 91.3 | 90.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1345U | 333% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 87% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1345U is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 4800HS since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1345U |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 259 | 197 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1901 | 1712 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 623 | 472 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4319 | 3847 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1457 | 1235 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14240 | 10590 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1345U |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 3414 | 2605 | | Multi-Core | 19935 | 18943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1345U |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 1499 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 8610 | 8153 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-1345U |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | January 06, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP6 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Renoir | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 13 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 4MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000098
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1345U is 17% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1345U has 2 more core than Ryzen 7 4800HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1345U is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is better: 3
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1345U and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1345U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
