 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like 7zip, 3DMark, Gears 5, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, PassMark, Furmark, SuperPi, Blender, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 56% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825C is 1% better than Ryzen 7 4800HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 5825C | 53% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.8 | 96.3 | | Valorant | 107.8 | 109.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 61.3 | | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 102.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 82.1 | | Overwatch | 87.3 | 88.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 75.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 84.1 | 85.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 91.9 | | Valheim | 89.4 | 90.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 288% |
Ryzen 7 4800HS | 87% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 5825C is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 4800HS as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 197 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 1712 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 472 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 3847 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 1235 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 10590 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 2603 | 2605 | | Multi-Core | 21502 | 18943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Single-Core | 1300 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 6695 | 8153 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | January 06, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FP6 | | Core name | Barcelo | Renoir | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 - Up to 3200MHz | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 8MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000098
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 4800HS is 31% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is better: 15
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
