 |
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Prime95, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 3DMark, Blender, 7zip, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1165G7 or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 53% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1165G7 is 1% better than Core i7-8650U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 52% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.3 | 93.1 | | Valorant | 104.8 | 105.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 59.2 | | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 99.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 79.3 | | Overwatch | 84.9 | 85.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 73.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.9 | | Warzone | 81.8 | 82.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.8 | | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 336% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1165G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8650U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 561 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 2234 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 1504 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 6070 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Single-Core | 2237 | 2906 | | Multi-Core | 6598 | 10376 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Single-Core | 1208 | 1513 | | Multi-Core | 4182 | 4969 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | BGA1526 | | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1165G7 is 32% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1165G7 is better: 27
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i7-1165G7 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i7-1165G7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-6500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
