 |
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-6200U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-6200U tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, SuperPi, Blender, Blender, 3DMark, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Furmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, RealBench, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-6200U or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-6200U | 50% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-8650U is 3% better than Core i5-6200U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-6200U | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.3 | 89.7 | | Valorant | 104.8 | 102.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 57.1 | | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 95.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 76.5 | | Overwatch | 84.9 | 82.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 70.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 51.0 | | Warzone | 81.8 | 79.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 85.6 | | Valheim | 87.0 | 84.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i5-6200U | 157% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6200U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-6200U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 119 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 290 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 282 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 735 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 716 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 1706 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-6200U | | Single-Core | 2237 | 1586 | | Multi-Core | 6598 | 3019 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-6200U | | Single-Core | 1208 | 707 | | Multi-Core | 4182 | 1691 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-6200U | | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2015 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1356 | | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Skylake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 8 | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 1750 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6200U is 17% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-8650U has 2 more core than Core i5-6200U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6200U is better: 3
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i5-6200U before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-6200U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Celeron N5105
|
|
|
