 |
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-10210U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-10210U and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Prime95, 3DMark, RealBench, PassMark, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10210U or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-10210U | 51% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-8650U is 1% better than Core i5-10210U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-10210U | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.3 | 92.2 | | Valorant | 104.8 | 104.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.7 | | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 78.6 | | Overwatch | 84.9 | 84.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 72.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.4 | | Warzone | 81.8 | 81.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.0 | | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i5-10210U | 243% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10210U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-10210U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 168 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 567 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 426 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 1206 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 883 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 3462 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-10210U | | Single-Core | 2237 | 2254 | | Multi-Core | 6598 | 6569 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-10210U | | Single-Core | 1208 | 1094 | | Multi-Core | 4182 | 4116 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-10210U | | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1528 | | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 1.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8650U is 15% better than Core i5-10210U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10210U is better: 8
All the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i5-10210U before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-10210U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
|
|
|
