 |
Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like AIDA64, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, UserBenchmark, Furmark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, RealBench, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1165G7 or Intel Celeron N5105.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1165G7 is 3% better than Celeron N5105. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 93.1 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 105.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 59.2 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 99.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 79.3 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 85.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 73.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 52.9 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 82.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 88.8 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 87.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N5105 | 237% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 336% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1165G7 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5105 since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 114 | | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 294 | | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 240 | 561 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 710 | 2234 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 515 | 1504 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1881 | 6070 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Single-Core | 1544 | 2906 | | Multi-Core | 3802 | 10376 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Single-Core | 712 | 1513 | | Multi-Core | 2280 | 4969 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | | Announcement date | March 14, 2021 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1338 | BGA1526 | | Core name | Jasper Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 10 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1165G7 is 28% better than Celeron N5105 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5105 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1165G7 is better: 27
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Celeron N5105 and Intel Core i7-1165G7 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5105 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i7-1165G7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-6500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
