|
Intel Core i7-9750HF vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-01-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-9750HF vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Blender, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, RealBench, 7zip, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1165G7 or Intel Core i7-9750HF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-9750HF | 53% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 53% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-9750HF | 53% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.2 | 93.1 | Valorant | 107.0 | 105.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.9 | 59.2 | Apex Legends | 100.6 | 99.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.3 | 79.3 | Overwatch | 86.7 | 85.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.8 | 73.0 | DOOM Eternal | 53.5 | 52.9 | Warzone | 83.5 | 82.5 | Assassin's Creed | 89.9 | 88.8 | Valheim | 88.8 | 87.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-9750HF | 79% |
Core i7-1165G7 | 336% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1165G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9750HF since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1182 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 441 | 561 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2653 | 2234 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1113 | 1504 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6912 | 6070 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Single-Core | 2596 | 2906 | Multi-Core | 11640 | 10376 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Single-Core | 1067 | 1513 | Multi-Core | 6055 | 4969 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-9750HF |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | BGA1526 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 6 | 4 | Threads | 12 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 5600 millions | 8200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1165G7 is 7% better than Core i7-9750HF in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9750HF has 2 more core than Core i7-1165G7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9750HF is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1165G7 is better: 12 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-9750HF and Intel Core i7-1165G7 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-9750HF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i7-13650HX
Intel Core i7-1165G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
| |
|