 |
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-9750H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-9750H and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, RealBench, PassMark, Blender, Blender, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, Furmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9750H or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-9750H | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-9750H is 1% better than Core i7-8650U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-9750H | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.3 | 94.2 | | Valorant | 104.8 | 107.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 60.0 | | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 100.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 80.3 | | Overwatch | 84.9 | 86.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 73.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 53.5 | | Warzone | 81.8 | 83.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 89.9 | | Valheim | 87.0 | 88.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i7-9750H | 89% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9750H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-9750H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 1182 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 441 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 2653 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 1113 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 6912 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-9750H | | Single-Core | 2237 | 2487 | | Multi-Core | 6598 | 11313 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-9750H | | Single-Core | 1208 | 1203 | | Multi-Core | 4182 | 6089 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-9750H | | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-9750H is 26% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9750H has 2 more core than Core i7-8650U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9750H is better: 30
Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i7-9750H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i7-9750H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
|
|
|
