|
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-10510U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i7-10510U and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, RealBench, 3DMark, Prime95, Gears 5, PassMark, Furmark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, WPrime, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 7zip, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10510U or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-10510U | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i7-10510U | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 92.3 | Valorant | 104.8 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 78.7 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 85.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.5 | Warzone | 81.8 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.1 | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i7-10510U | 270% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10510U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8650U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-10510U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 188 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 758 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 471 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 1523 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 1102 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 3271 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-10510U | Single-Core | 2237 | 2452 | Multi-Core | 6598 | 7011 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-10510U | Single-Core | 1208 | 1215 | Multi-Core | 4182 | 4248 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i7-10510U | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1528 | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8650U is 5% better than Core i7-10510U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10510U is better: 23 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i7-10510U before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i7-10510U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
| |
|