|
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-9300H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-9300H and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, Furmark, Prime95, PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Gears 5, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, RealBench, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9300H or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 92.4 | Valorant | 104.8 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.5 | Warzone | 81.8 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.2 | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i5-9300H | 78% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9300H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 162 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 615 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 422 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 2111 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 1062 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 4161 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Single-Core | 2237 | 2411 | Multi-Core | 6598 | 7895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Single-Core | 1208 | 1064 | Multi-Core | 4182 | 4347 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9300H is 20% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9300H is better: 26 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i5-9300H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-9300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
| |
|