|
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Furmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, 3DMark, Prime95, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Blender, MATLAB, Handbrake, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1115G4 or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-8650U is 1% better than Core i3-1115G4. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 91.0 | Valorant | 104.8 | 103.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 57.9 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 97.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 77.6 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 83.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 71.3 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 51.7 | Warzone | 81.8 | 80.7 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 86.9 | Valheim | 87.0 | 85.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 0% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1115G4 since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 0W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 158 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 621 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 419 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 1535 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 3206 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Single-Core | 2237 | 2765 | Multi-Core | 6598 | 6415 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Single-Core | 1208 | 1348 | Multi-Core | 4182 | 2938 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 3200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1115G4 is 36% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-8650U has 2 more core than Core i3-1115G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1115G4 is better: 13 The summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i3-1115G4 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i3-1115G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|