|
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-8300H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-8300H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Blender, Gears 5, 7zip, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, 3DMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, AIDA64, Prime95, SuperPi, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-8300H or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-8300H | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-8300H | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 92.4 | Valorant | 104.8 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.5 | Warzone | 81.8 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.2 | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i5-8300H | 82% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-8300H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 169 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 795 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 1689 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 1019 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 3996 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Single-Core | 2237 | 2363 | Multi-Core | 6598 | 7583 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Single-Core | 1208 | 1109 | Multi-Core | 4182 | 4352 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | April 01, 2018 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 2100 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-8300H is 17% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8300H is better: 25 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i5-8300H before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-8300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|