|
Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-7200U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-7200U and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as UserBenchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Blender, RealBench, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, MATLAB, Blender, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator. And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-7200U or Intel Core i7-8650U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-7200U | 51% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-8650U is 1% better than Core i5-7200U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8650U | 52% |
Core i5-7200U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 90.0 | Valorant | 104.8 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 96.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 82.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 51.1 | Warzone | 81.8 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 85.9 | Valheim | 87.0 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8650U | 268% |
Core i5-7200U | 192% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8650U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-7200U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 175 | 132 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 614 | 334 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 365 | 308 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1299 | 652 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1037 | 817 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3576 | 1978 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Single-Core | 2237 | 1807 | Multi-Core | 6598 | 3391 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Single-Core | 1208 | 864 | Multi-Core | 4182 | 1952 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8650U |
Intel Core i5-7200U | Announcement date | September 23, 2017 | October 01, 2016 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1356 | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Kaby Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 1810 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-7200U is 24% better than Core i7-8650U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-8650U has 2 more core than Core i5-7200U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8650U is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-7200U is better: 3 All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8650U and Intel Core i5-7200U before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8650U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i5-7200U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|