 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c vs Intel Core i5-9300H |
|
Processor comparisons 28-02-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c vs Intel Core i5-9300H and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, 7zip, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, PassMark, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, AIDA64, WPrime, SuperPi, Prime95, 3DMark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9300H or Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Snapdragon 7c | 50% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-9300H is 3% better than Snapdragon 7c. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Snapdragon 7c | 50% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.7 | 92.4 | | Valorant | 101.9 | 105.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.1 | 58.8 | | Apex Legends | 95.8 | 98.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 78.8 | | Overwatch | 82.6 | 85.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.3 | 72.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 52.5 | | Warzone | 79.5 | 81.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.6 | 88.2 | | Valheim | 84.6 | 87.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Snapdragon 7c | 227% |
Core i5-9300H | 78% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Snapdragon 7c is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9300H since it has less power consumption: 8W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c |
Intel Core i5-9300H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 61 | 162 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 144 | 615 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 118 | 422 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 239 | 2111 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 331 | 1062 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 911 | 4161 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c |
Intel Core i5-9300H | | Single-Core | 405 | 2411 | | Multi-Core | 2561 | 7895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c |
Intel Core i5-9300H | | Single-Core | 546 | 1064 | | Multi-Core | 1668 | 4347 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c |
Intel Core i5-9300H | | Announcement date | May 24, 2021 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | Unk | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Kryo 468 | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | | Generation | 1 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 3600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 45 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1MB | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Snapdragon 7c has 4 more core than Core i5-9300H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9300H is better: 27
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c and Intel Core i5-9300H before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Processor Comparisons
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-9300H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
|
|
|
