|
Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Core i5-9300H |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Core i5-9300H and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark 10, SuperPi, 3DMark, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Handbrake, 7zip, WPrime, Prime95. And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9300H or Intel Core i3-1110G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-9300H is 1% better than Core i3-1110G4. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1110G4 | 51% |
Core i5-9300H | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.9 | 92.4 | Valorant | 103.3 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.8 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 97.1 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.5 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 83.6 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.3 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.6 | 52.5 | Warzone | 80.5 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 86.7 | 88.2 | Valheim | 85.7 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1110G4 | 431% |
Core i5-9300H | 78% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1110G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9300H since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 162 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 596 | 615 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 402 | 422 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1474 | 2111 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 793 | 1062 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3078 | 4161 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Single-Core | 2654 | 2411 | Multi-Core | 6158 | 7895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Single-Core | 1294 | 1064 | Multi-Core | 2820 | 4347 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1110G4 |
Intel Core i5-9300H | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 2 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3200 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 45 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1110G4 is 4% better than Core i5-9300H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-9300H has 2 more core than Core i3-1110G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1110G4 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9300H is better: 27 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-1110G4 and Intel Core i5-9300H before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1110G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-9300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
| |
|