|
Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as MATLAB, Blender, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, AIDA64, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Prime95, RealBench, Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1115G4 or Intel Core i9-9880H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 51% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9880H is 5% better than Core i3-1115G4. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 91.0 | Valorant | 108.4 | 103.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 57.9 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 97.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 77.6 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 83.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 71.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 51.7 | Warzone | 84.5 | 80.7 | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 86.9 | Valheim | 90.0 | 85.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-9880H | 82% |
Core i3-1115G4 | 0% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-9880H is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1115G4 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 0W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 158 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1535 | 621 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 419 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3462 | 1535 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1162 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 8311 | 3206 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Single-Core | 2554 | 2765 | Multi-Core | 14080 | 6415 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Single-Core | 1118 | 1348 | Multi-Core | 7238 | 2938 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 8 | 2 | Threads | 16 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 3200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1115G4 is 23% better than Core i9-9880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9880H has 6 more core than Core i3-1115G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9880H is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1115G4 is better: 9 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-9880H and Intel Core i3-1115G4 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-9880H Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-1115G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|