|
Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, Gears 5, 7zip, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700HQ or Intel Core i3-1115G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1115G4 | 51% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1115G4 | 51% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.0 | 91.7 | Valorant | 103.4 | 104.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.9 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 97.2 | 98.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 78.2 | Overwatch | 83.8 | 84.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.3 | 71.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.7 | 52.1 | Warzone | 80.7 | 81.3 | Assassin's Creed | 86.9 | 87.5 | Valheim | 85.8 | 86.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1115G4 | 0% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 71% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-6700HQ is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1115G4 as it consumes less power: 0W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 158 | 148 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 621 | 692 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 419 | 361 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1535 | 1651 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 826 | 891 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3206 | 3958 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 2765 | 1937 | Multi-Core | 6415 | 6493 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 1348 | 971 | Multi-Core | 2938 | 3643 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1115G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3200 millions | 1880 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1115G4 is 13% better than Core i7-6700HQ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-6700HQ has 2 more core than Core i3-1115G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1115G4 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700HQ is better: 21 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1115G4 and Intel Core i7-6700HQ before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1115G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
Intel Core i7-6700HQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|