|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs AMD EPYC 7643 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-08-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs AMD EPYC 7643 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7643 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 74% |
EPYC 7643 | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 10% better than EPYC 7643. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 61% |
EPYC 7643 | 70% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.7 | 123.8 | Valorant | 123.5 | 140.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.1 | 78.8 | Apex Legends | 116.1 | 132.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.6 | 105.5 | Overwatch | 100.0 | 113.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.2 | 97.0 | DOOM Eternal | 61.7 | 70.3 | Warzone | 96.3 | 109.7 | Assassin's Creed | 103.7 | 118.1 | Valheim | 102.5 | 116.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | 16% |
EPYC 7643 | 18% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7643 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 195 | 166 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 10553 | 6845 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 432 | 312 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 22406 | 14509 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1123 | 767 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 67074 | 37728 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Single-Core | 2460 | 1615 | Multi-Core | 81681 | 55343 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Single-Core | 1350 | 1222 | Multi-Core | 20255 | 35055 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 24 | 48 | Threads | 48 | 96 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 32MB | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000446WOF | 100-000000326 100-100000326WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 39% better than EPYC 7643 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7643 has 24 more core than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is better: 14
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7643 is better: 17 Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and AMD EPYC 7643 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
AMD EPYC 7643 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|