 |
Intel Core i5-13600 vs AMD EPYC 7643 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-11-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13600 vs AMD EPYC 7643 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like MATLAB, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Blender, PassMark, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Handbrake, SuperPi, 3DMark, RealBench, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7643 or Intel Core i5-13600.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600 | 63% |
EPYC 7643 | 66% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7643 is 4% better than Core i5-13600. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600 | 59% |
EPYC 7643 | 70% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.2 | 123.8 | Valorant | 118.4 | 140.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.3 | 78.8 | Apex Legends | 111.3 | 132.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.8 | 105.5 | Overwatch | 95.9 | 113.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.7 | 97.0 | DOOM Eternal | 59.2 | 70.3 | Warzone | 92.3 | 109.7 | Assassin's Creed | 99.5 | 118.1 | Valheim | 98.3 | 116.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600 | 100% |
EPYC 7643 | 18% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7643 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 383 | 166 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3979 | 6845 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 637 | 312 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8839 | 14509 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2241 | 767 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 25423 | 37728 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Single-Core | 2048 | 1615 | Multi-Core | 43328 | 55343 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600 |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Single-Core | 1965 | 1222 | Multi-Core | 15871 | 35055 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600 |
AMD EPYC 7643 | Announcement date | December 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Adler Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 13 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 48 | Threads | 20 | 96 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000326 100-100000326WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600 is 34% better than EPYC 7643 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7643 has 34 more core than Core i5-13600. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7643 is better: 20 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD EPYC 7643 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7643 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|