|
Intel Core i7-6900K vs Intel Core i9-9900T |
|
Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-6900K vs Intel Core i9-9900T and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, RealBench, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, 7zip, Furmark, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9900T or Intel Core i7-6900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-6900K | 54% |
Core i9-9900T | 54% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-6900K | 55% |
Core i9-9900T | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.2 | 95.4 | Valorant | 110.4 | 108.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.8 | 60.7 | Apex Legends | 103.8 | 101.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.8 | 81.3 | Overwatch | 89.4 | 87.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.2 | 74.8 | DOOM Eternal | 55.2 | 54.2 | Warzone | 86.1 | 84.5 | Assassin's Creed | 92.7 | 91.0 | Valheim | 91.6 | 89.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-6900K | 24% |
Core i9-9900T | 106% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-9900T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6900K since it has less power consumption: 140W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-6900K |
Intel Core i9-9900T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 207 | 191 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1439 | 1644 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 484 | 449 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3668 | 3920 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1151 | 951 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11326 | 9218 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-6900K |
Intel Core i9-9900T | Single-Core | 2405 | 2489 | Multi-Core | 13871 | 13885 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-6900K |
Intel Core i9-9900T | Single-Core | 1016 | 1113 | Multi-Core | 8971 | 7212 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-6900K |
Intel Core i9-9900T | Announcement date | April 01, 2016 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Broadwell E | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 6 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.1 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4 2400/2133 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6900K is 34% better than Core i9-9900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6900K is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900T is better: 12 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-6900K and Intel Core i9-9900T before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-6900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i9-9900T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F
| |
|