|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Intel Core i5-10200H |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Intel Core i5-10200H and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Blender, 7zip, WPrime, Gears 5, Handbrake, PassMark, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10200H or AMD Ryzen 5 2500X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
Core i5-10200H | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
Core i5-10200H | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 92.6 | Valorant | 104.9 | 105.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.9 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.7 | 78.9 | Overwatch | 85.0 | 85.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.4 | 72.6 | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 52.6 | Warzone | 81.8 | 82.1 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.4 | Valheim | 87.1 | 87.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 2500X | 56% |
Core i5-10200H | 86% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-10200H is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 2500X as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i5-10200H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 148 | 156 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 754 | 927 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 377 | 399 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1620 | 2226 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1028 | 994 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4738 | 5303 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i5-10200H | Single-Core | 2312 | 2560 | Multi-Core | 9540 | 9001 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i5-10200H | Single-Core | 1092 | 1172 | Multi-Core | 4231 | 4530 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i5-10200H | Announcement date | September 10, 2018 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 2 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 8MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD250XBBM4KAF
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 2500X is 33% better than Core i5-10200H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10200H is better: 27 Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 2500X and Intel Core i5-10200H before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-10200H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U
| |
|