 |
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Intel Core i7-9700T |
|
Processor comparisons 18-02-2022
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs Intel Core i7-9700T tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 3DMark, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, Furmark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, MATLAB.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9700T or AMD Ryzen 5 2500X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
Core i7-9700T | 53% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-9700T is 1% better than Ryzen 5 2500X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 2500X | 52% |
Core i7-9700T | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.3 | 94.5 | | Valorant | 104.9 | 107.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 60.1 | | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 100.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.7 | 80.5 | | Overwatch | 85.0 | 87.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.4 | 74.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 81.8 | 83.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 90.2 | | Valheim | 87.1 | 89.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 2500X | 56% |
Core i7-9700T | 109% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-9700T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 2500X since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i7-9700T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 148 | 193 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 754 | 1122 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 377 | 460 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1620 | 1752 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1028 | 1246 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4738 | 6562 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i7-9700T | | Single-Core | 2312 | 2497 | | Multi-Core | 9540 | 10740 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i7-9700T | | Single-Core | 1092 | 1145 | | Multi-Core | 4231 | 6342 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X |
Intel Core i7-9700T | | Announcement date | September 10, 2018 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | YD250XBBM4KAF
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 2500X is 44% better than Core i7-9700T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9700T has 4 more core than Ryzen 5 2500X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9700T is better: 30
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 2500X and Intel Core i7-9700T before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-9700T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
|
|
|
