 |
Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Pentium J6426 |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Pentium J6426 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Gears 5, Prime95, Furmark, WPrime, 7zip, Blender, AIDA64, PassMark, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium J6426 or Intel Celeron N5095.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Pentium J6426 | 50% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron N5095 is 1% better than Pentium J6426. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Pentium J6426 | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.2 | 89.5 | | Valorant | 102.5 | 101.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 56.9 | | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 95.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.3 | | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 70.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 50.8 | | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 85.4 | | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N5095 | 132% |
Pentium J6426 | 136% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium J6426 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5095 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 10W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Pentium J6426 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 103 | 66 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 273 | 249 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 222 | 282 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 663 | 653 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 481 | 705 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1764 | 1678 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Pentium J6426 | | Single-Core | 1448 | 1172 | | Multi-Core | 3571 | 2969 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Pentium J6426 | | Single-Core | 597 | 410 | | Multi-Core | 2119 | 1447 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Pentium J6426 | | Announcement date | January 11, 2021 | October 01, 2016 | | Type | Laptop | Embedded | | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1493 | | Core name | Jasper Lake | Elkhart Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 11 | 7 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 14 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 10 W | | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | 59.7 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium J6426 is better: 6
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5095 and Intel Pentium J6426 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs 3015e
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Pentium J6426 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs 3015e
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
