|
Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C tests and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, WPrime, PassMark, Blender, Furmark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Handbrake, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3250C or Intel Celeron N5095.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.2 | 89.9 | Valorant | 102.5 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 85.8 | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5095 | 132% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 193% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 3250C is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5095 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 103 | 142 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 273 | 354 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 222 | 318 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 663 | 774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 481 | 573 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1764 | 2346 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 1448 | 1946 | Multi-Core | 3571 | 4330 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 597 | 871 | Multi-Core | 2119 | 1825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5095 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Announcement date | January 11, 2021 | September 22, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FP5 | Core name | Jasper Lake | Dali | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 11 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 192KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YM325CC4T2OFG
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3250C is 23% better than Celeron N5095 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5095 has 2 more core than Ryzen 3 3250C. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is better: 15 Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5095 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250C before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U
| |
|