|
Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron N5095 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron N5095 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Furmark, MATLAB, RealBench, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime. Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5095 or Intel Core i3-7102E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Celeron N5095 | 51% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron N5095 is 1% better than Core i3-7102E. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Celeron N5095 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.1 | 90.2 | Valorant | 101.2 | 102.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 57.4 | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 96.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 75.9 | 76.8 | Overwatch | 82.0 | 83.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 70.7 | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 51.2 | Warzone | 79.0 | 79.9 | Assassin's Creed | 85.0 | 86.1 | Valheim | 84.0 | 85.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-7102E | 75% |
Celeron N5095 | 132% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5095 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-7102E since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 99 | 103 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 256 | 273 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 252 | 222 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 595 | 663 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 481 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1645 | 1764 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Single-Core | 1279 | 1448 | Multi-Core | 2528 | 3571 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Single-Core | 568 | 597 | Multi-Core | 1074 | 2119 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N5095 | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | January 11, 2021 | Type | Embedded | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1338 | Core name | Kaby Lake | Jasper Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | | 2.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7102E is 4% better than Celeron N5095 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5095 has 2 more core than Core i3-7102E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7102E is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 27 All the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-7102E and Intel Celeron N5095 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-7102E Processor Comparisons • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs 3020e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|