Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i3-8109U vs Intel Celeron N5095 gaming benchmark

Intel Core i3-8109U vs Intel Celeron N5095

Processor comparisons   20-01-2022
   For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-8109U vs Intel Celeron N5095 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, PCMark 10, Blender, RealBench, Blender, Furmark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, WPrime, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:
  • Halo Infinite
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Valorant
  • Apex Legends
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Fallout 76
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Death Stranding
  • Valheim
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Fortnite
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Borderlands 3
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Last Man Standing

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N5095 or Intel Core i3-8109U.

 
Intel Core i3-8109U
Intel Celeron N5095

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8109U51% Celeron N509551%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i3-8109U51% Celeron N509551%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite90.390.2
Valorant102.6102.5
Cyberpunk 207757.557.4
Apex Legends96.596.3
Call of Duty Warzone77.076.8
Overwatch83.183.0
Red Dead Redemption 270.870.7
DOOM Eternal51.351.2
Warzone80.179.9
Assassin's Creed86.286.1
Valheim85.285.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i3-8109U119% Celeron N5095132%
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5095 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8109U as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i3-8109U Intel Celeron N5095
Cinbench 15 Single-core149103
Cinbench 15 Multi-core392273
Cinbench 20 Single-core366222
Cinbench 20 Multi-core916663
Cinbench 23 Single-core559481
Cinbench 23 Multi-core21711764

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-8109U Intel Celeron N5095
Single-Core21851448
Multi-Core43423571

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-8109U Intel Celeron N5095
Single-Core1003597
Multi-Core22762119

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

Intel Core i3-8109U Intel Celeron N5095
Announcement dateJuly 07, 2018January 11, 2021
TypeLaptopLaptop
SocketFCBGA1528FCBGA1338
Core nameCoffee LakeJasper Lake
Architecturex86x86
Generation811
Turbo Frequency3.6 MHz2.9 MHz
Frequency3 MHz2 MHz
Cores24
Threads44
Bus rate4 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm10 nm
Transistors count1900 millions1400 millions
Power consumption (TDP)28 W15 W
Memory typeDDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133DDR4 LPDDR4x
Max. Memory32 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part numberExpansion Options
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8109U is 33% better than Celeron N5095 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5095 has 2 more core than Core i3-8109U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8109U is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 5
   Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-8109U and Intel Celeron N5095 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-8109U - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
Intel Celeron N5095 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Core i3-8109U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs 3015e
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands