Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Atom Z3580 vs Spreadtrum SC9832 benchmark which processor is better

Intel Atom Z3580 vs Spreadtrum SC9832

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z3580 vs Spreadtrum SC9832, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and PowerVR G6430.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Atom Z3580 is quad-core (Moorefield) and Spreadtrum SC9832 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Octane V2, 3DMark, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Atom Z3580 or Spreadtrum SC9832 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
Intel Atom Z3580
Spreadtrum SC9832

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Atom Z35803% Spreadtrum SC98321%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Atom Z358034% Spreadtrum SC983230%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Atom Z35802% Spreadtrum SC98321%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Atom Z3580 Spreadtrum SC9832
Total score4389722092
CPU122986178
GPU166738392
MEM70333534
UX79053986

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Atom Z3580 Spreadtrum SC9832
Single-Core11658
Multi-Core536270

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Atom Z3580 Spreadtrum SC9832
Frequency2330 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit6432
Lithography22 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.33 GHz Moorefield4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)3 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR2
Max. Memory4 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency1600266
Memory bandwidth144
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3580 is 44% better than Spreadtrum SC9832 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR G6430Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency533 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS136.48.4
# of Cores42
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile14.73.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)36.815.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra24.69.5
Call of Duty: Mobile21.98.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)30.312.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition45.620.1
Real Racing 343.119
Sniper 3D3215.2
Need for Speed No Limits39.413.3
Mortal Kombat X35.715.2
CSR Racing 234.411.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemIntel XMM 7160
Upload speed6 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3580 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832 is better: 0
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Atom Z3580 and Spreadtrum SC9832, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom Z3580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Atom Z3580 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S


Spreadtrum SC9832 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands