|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 vs MediaTek MT8321 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 vs MediaTek MT8321, speed testing of GPUs Mali-400 and Adreno 302. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT8321 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 or MT8321 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 1% |
MT8321 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 22% |
MT8321 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 200 MSM8212 | 1% |
MT8321 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
MT8321 | Total score | 14552 | 21905 | CPU | 4066 | 6127 | GPU | 5528 | 8316 | MEM | 2333 | 3495 | UX | 2628 | 3950 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
MT8321 | Single-Core | 38 | 58 | Multi-Core | 177 | 267 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
MT8321 | Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR 2 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 333 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8321 is 7% better than Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 302 | Mali-400 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 19.2 | 3.6 | # of Cores | | 1 | # of Shader Units | 24 | | Display | 960 x 540 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.4 | 5.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 10.6 | 16.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 6.5 | 11.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 5.8 | 10.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 8.5 | 13.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 13.4 | 21.7 | Real Racing 3 | 9.8 | 22.6 | Sniper 3D | 10.4 | 14.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 9.1 | 20.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 9.4 | 18.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 7.8 | 14.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8321 is better: 25 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 and MT8321, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
MT8321 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
| |
|