Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Comparisons   08-01-2024
   Detailed testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or MediaTek Dimensity 7050.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 9000SL33% MediaTek Dimensity 705040%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 9000SL86% MediaTek Dimensity 705083%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 9000SL32% MediaTek Dimensity 705037%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 9000SL MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Total score716097617016
CPU200500172759
GPU272118234461
MEM11457998726
UX128898111058

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 9000SL MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Single-Core1026989
Multi-Core39193441

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 9000SL MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Frequency2350 MHz2600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)6 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR5, LPDDR4xLPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency16002133
Memory bandwidth4424
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is 9% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMaleoon 910Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency750 MHz800 MHz
GFloPS2056686
# of Cores44
# of Shader Units128
Display2560 x 1600 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.228.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)83.669.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.295.7
Call of Duty: Mobile47.153.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)72.259.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition105.387.4
Real Racing 364.8191.4
Sniper 3D67.3210.6
Need for Speed No Limits72.1153.8
Mortal Kombat X75.3153.8
CSR Racing 272.4134.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution128 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemBalong 5G5G Multi-Mode
Download speed15000 MBit/s.3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed14000 MBit/s.2000 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouNavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 21
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 16
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 9000SL SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands