|
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
|
Comparisons 01-05-2023 Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7050 or Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 40% |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 78% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 83% |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 37% |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 76% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Total score | 617016 | 1085878 | CPU | 172759 | 304036 | GPU | 234461 | 412640 | MEM | 98726 | 173742 | UX | 111058 | 195461 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Single-Core | 989 | 1514 | Multi-Core | 3441 | 4774 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 88 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is 18% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 686 | 1800 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | 1024 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.8 | 41.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 69.3 | 128.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 95.7 | 77.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 53.2 | 70.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 59.1 | 110.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 87.4 | 158.6 | Real Racing 3 | 191.4 | 154.9 | Sniper 3D | 210.6 | 169.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 153.8 | 107.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 153.8 | 111.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 134.9 | 92.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 685 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GNSS, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou, GLONASS, NavIC | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is better: 31 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
| |
|