 |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 |
|
Comparisons 08-01-2024 Full testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or MediaTek Dimensity 7030.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 9000SL | 33% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | 43% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 9000SL | 86% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 9000SL | 32% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | 42% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000SL |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Total score | 716097 | 599129 | CPU | 200500 | 167753 | GPU | 272118 | 227667 | MEM | 114579 | 95853 | UX | 128898 | 107843 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000SL |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Single-Core | 1026 | 960 | Multi-Core | 3919 | 3342 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000SL |
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Frequency | 2350 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7030 is 6% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G610 MC3 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 1008 | # of Cores | 4 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.2 | 27.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 83.6 | 67.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.2 | 92.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 47.1 | 51.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 72.2 | 57.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 105.3 | 83.9 | Real Racing 3 | 64.8 | 186.9 | Sniper 3D | 67.3 | 204.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.1 | 147.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 75.3 | 148.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 72.4 | 129.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7030 is better: 13 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|